2.
X informed the police that in the dacoity committed in the House of M, he has a reason to believe that his neighbour Y was involved. Y is consequently arrested by the police. Subsequently he is released. Y files an action for malicious prosecution.

3.
Match List-I (Name of case) with List-II (Decision of case) by using below:
List I (Name of case) List II (Decision of cases)
a. Manju Bhatia v. New Delhi Municipal Corporation 1. Liability of owner of tree for an injury caused by its falling
b. Delhi Municipal Corporation v. Sushiia Devi 2. Legal duty of Railway to assure reasonable safety at railway level crossing
c. Union of India v. Lalman 3. Teacher's duty of case towards children when they are taken out on a picnic for fun and swim
d. M. S. Grewal v. Deepchand Sood 4. Liability of builder towards purchasers of flats

5.
Consider the following statements:
Tort of conspiracy requires:
1. An agreement between two or more persons.
2. Doing of an illegal act or legal act with illegal means.
3. Consequential damage to other party.
4. An act must be actually done by all the conspirators.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

7.
Match List-I (name of case) with List-II (name of defense) and give the correct answer by using the given below:
List I (Decided case) List II (Principle stated)
a. Samira Kohli v. Prabha Manchanda 1. Plaintiff a wrong-doer
b. Sodan Singh v. New Delhi Municipal Committee 2. Leave and licence
c. Bird v. Holbrook 3. Act of God
d. Kallulal v. Hemchand 4. Necessity

9.
The principle of 'Res ipsa loquitur' was followed by the Supreme Court in the case of

10.
In case of tortuous liability, an act done under the authority of a statute-

Read More Section(Law of Torts)

Each Section contains maximum 100 MCQs question on Law of Torts. To get more questions visit other sections.