Law Of Torts MCQ question and answer | Law MCQ question

Which is a case on Injuira Sine Damnum

The doctrine of the liability of the master for acts of his servant is based on the maxim

Rule of absolute liability was propounded by:

One Y suffered serious injuries in a railway accident. He was assisted by a surgeon, X, on the evidence of whose Y succeeded in recovering heavy damages against the Railway. Later on it was reported to the Railway that Y did not suffer so serious an injury as was made out by X who fraudulently created those symptoms. On legal advice obtained by the Railway, X was prosecuted but he was acquitted. He brought a suit against Railway for malicious prosecution.

An overloaded rickshaw with three adults and a child on it. While being driven on the correct side of the road, is hit by a bus being driven at high speed and coming on the wrong side. Which one of the following is correct in this context?

Claim on the basis of 'No fault liability' can be made under

In a claim for malicious prosecution, damages can be claimed on account of

An act done as Act of State has to be justified

There is difference between the torts of libel and slander. Which of the following is not correct?

Between 'A' and 'B' and a third person 'C' the tort of conspiracy is committed when: