Law Of Torts MCQ question and answer | Law MCQ question Page-1 section-8

Section 1 Section 2 Section 3 Section 4 Section 5 Section 6 Section 7 Section 8 Section 9 Section 10

1.
If a person wrote that all lawyers were thieves, he can be sued by

A. A few lawyers banding together

B. A particular lawyer

C. A particular lawyer if there was something in the article to point at the particular individual

D. Any lawyer

Answer & Solution Discuss in Board Save for Later

2.
Under the Indian Law

A. Libel is actionable per se

B. Slander is actionable per se

C. Libel and Slander are actionable per se

D. None of the above

Answer & Solution Discuss in Board Save for Later

3.
Which of the following is not correctly matched?

a. Damnum sine injuria 1. Town Area Committee v. Prabhu Dayal

b. Act of God 2. Smith v. Charles Baker

c. Defamation 3. Cassidy v. Daily Mirror Newspaper

d. Valenti non fit injuria 4. Haynes v. Harwood

A. a-1, b-2, c-3, d-4

B. a-1, b-4, c-3, d-2

C. a-4, b-3, c-2, d-1

D. a-3, b-2, c-4, d-1

Answer & Solution Discuss in Board Save for Later

4.
In his definition of 'Law of Tort', Winfield supports the principle given in the maxim:

A. Ubi remedium ibi jus

B. Ubi jus ibi remedium

C. Respondeat superior

D. Damnum sine injuria

Answer & Solution Discuss in Board Save for Later

5.
According to the 'objective theory of negligence', negligence is a

A. State of mind

B. Type of conduct

C. State of heart

D. All of these

Answer & Solution Discuss in Board Save for Later

6.
Which of the following statements is correct?

A. The liability of master and servant is joint

B. The liability of master and servant is several

C. The liability of master and servant is sometimes joint and sometimes several depending on circumstances

D. The liability of master and servant is joint and several

Answer & Solution Discuss in Board Save for Later

7.
Which one of the following statements is not correct?

A. Joint tort-feasors are jointly and severally liable for the whole damage resulting from the tort

B. If sued jointly, the damages may be levied from all or eithe

C. To constitute a joint liability, the act complained of may neither be joint or separate

D. The joint liability arises when one person employs another to do an act which turns out to be a tort

Answer & Solution Discuss in Board Save for Later

8.
A had constructed a temporary structure on a land belonging to the Municipal Corporation in which he ran a flourishing restaurant that was frequented by elites of the town. The Municipal Corporation constructed a huge Public Toilet in the plot adjoining A's famous restaurant. Does A have any remedy under Tort Law?

A. He has remedy to get the Municipal Corporations' action stopped as it constituted a nuisance

B. He had the freedom to hedge the restaurant by putting up screens and boards

C. He has no remedy because he did not own the plot

D. None of the above

Answer & Solution Discuss in Board Save for Later

9.
P, owner of a car, asked his friend Q to drive the car to Bombay where he would join him. As the car was about five kilometers from Bombay it hit a pedestrian R, on account of Q's negligent driving and injured him seriously. R sued P for damages. In this case:

A. P is not liable

B. The liability is solely of Q as P was not accompanying him

C. Since Q was driving P's car, Q was under authority, P is liable

D. P has the defense of inevitable accident

Answer & Solution Discuss in Board Save for Later

10.
Which of the following falls under the categories of Act of God

A. Storm and cyclone

B. Extra ordinary rainfall or flood

C. Lightning and thunder

D. All of the above

Answer & Solution Discuss in Board Save for Later

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

a. Damnum sine injuria	1. Town Area Committee v. Prabhu Dayal
b. Act of God	2. Smith v. Charles Baker
c. Defamation	3. Cassidy v. Daily Mirror Newspaper
d. Valenti non fit injuria	4. Haynes v. Harwood

Law Of Torts MCQ question and answer | Law MCQ question

1. If a person wrote that all lawyers were thieves, he can be sued by

Answer & Solution

2. Under the Indian Law

Answer & Solution

3. Which of the following is not correctly matched? a. Damnum sine injuria 1. Town Area Committee v. Prabhu Dayal b. Act of God 2. Smith v. Charles Baker c. Defamation 3. Cassidy v. Daily Mirror Newspaper d. Valenti non fit injuria 4. Haynes v. Harwood

Answer & Solution

4. In his definition of 'Law of Tort', Winfield supports the principle given in the maxim:

Answer & Solution

5. According to the 'objective theory of negligence', negligence is a

Answer & Solution

6. Which of the following statements is correct?

Answer & Solution

7. Which one of the following statements is not correct?

Answer & Solution

Answer & Solution

9. P, owner of a car, asked his friend Q to drive the car to Bombay where he would join him. As the car was about five kilometers from Bombay it hit a pedestrian R, on account of Q's negligent driving and injured him seriously. R sued P for damages. In this case:

Answer & Solution

10. Which of the following falls under the categories of Act of God

Answer & Solution

Read More Section(Law of Torts)

1.
If a person wrote that all lawyers were thieves, he can be sued by

2.
Under the Indian Law

3.
Which of the following is not correctly matched?

a. Damnum sine injuria 1. Town Area Committee v. Prabhu Dayal

b. Act of God 2. Smith v. Charles Baker

c. Defamation 3. Cassidy v. Daily Mirror Newspaper

d. Valenti non fit injuria 4. Haynes v. Harwood

4.
In his definition of 'Law of Tort', Winfield supports the principle given in the maxim:

5.
According to the 'objective theory of negligence', negligence is a

6.
Which of the following statements is correct?

7.
Which one of the following statements is not correct?

9.
P, owner of a car, asked his friend Q to drive the car to Bombay where he would join him. As the car was about five kilometers from Bombay it hit a pedestrian R, on account of Q's negligent driving and injured him seriously. R sued P for damages. In this case:

10.
Which of the following falls under the categories of Act of God