71
A suit by a person excluded from a joint family property to enforce a right to share therein, under Article 110 of the Schedule, can be filed within the period of limitation of
A)
One year
B)
Three years
C)
Twelve years
D)
Thirty years
Answer & Solution
Answer: Option
C
72
A suit can be said to be in limitation even after period prescribed
A)
If the parties to the suit by agreement had agreed to waive it
B)
If the defendant admits the whole claim of the plaintiff in notice reply
C)
If the defendant acknowledges liability of the plaintiff's right before expiration of the period of limitation
D)
If the defendant does not raise any objection to the plaintiffs claim on the ground of limitation
Answer & Solution
Answer: Option
C
73
Section 5 of the Limitation Act is:
A)
Applicable to the proceedings under Section 34, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and the time limit prescribed under Section 34 can be extended generally
B)
Not applicable to the proceedings under Section 34 Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 and the time limit prescribed under Section 34 is absolute and un-extendable
C)
Applicable to the proceedings under Section 34 Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and time limit prescribed under Section 34 can be extended only in exceptional circumstances
D)
Not applicable to the proceedings under Section 34, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, however, the time limit prescribed under Section 34 can be extended under inherent powers of the court
Answer & Solution
Answer: Option
B
74
Under section 18(2) oral evidence of date of acknowledgement is permissible if the acknowledgement
A)
Is dated
B)
Is undated
C)
Date in the acknowledgement is altered
D)
In all above cases
Answer & Solution
Answer: Option
B
75
Period during which proceedings stand stayed by an injunction or order is excluded:
A)
Under Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963
B)
Under Section 15 of the Limitation Act, 1963
C)
Under Section 16 of the Limitation Act, 1963
D)
Under Section 13 of the Limitation Act, 1963
Answer & Solution
Answer: Option
B
76
In which of the following cases, the reference on the question whether use of the expression "date" in Article 54 of the Schedule to the Act is suggestive of a specific date in the calendar, has been answered by the Supreme Court in . . . . . . . .?
A)
Ramzan v. Hussaini
B)
Tarlok Singh v. Vijay Kumar Sabharwal
C)
Ahmadsahab Abdul Mulla v. Bibijan
D)
S. Brahmanad v. K. R. Muthugopal
Answer & Solution
Answer: Option
A
77
The extension of time granted by section 4, Limitation Act, 1963
A)
Can be combined with section 5, Limitation Act
B)
Can be combined with section 12, Limitation Act
C)
Can be combined with section 5 and section 12, Limitation Act
D)
Cannot be combined with section 5 and section 12, Limitation Act
Answer & Solution
Answer: Option
B
78
In computing the period of limitation for any suit, the time during which the defendant has been absent from India
A)
Will not be excluded
B)
May be excluded in discretion of the court
C)
Shall be excluded
D)
None of these
Answer & Solution
Answer: Option
C
79
For claiming easementary right, one must have enjoyed open and peaceful access for a period of:
A)
15 years
B)
10 years
C)
20 years
D)
40 years
Answer & Solution
Answer: Option
C
80
Under Section 21 of Limitation Act, a suit is deemed to have been instituted, in case of a new plaintiff impleaded/added
A)
On the date on which the new plaintiff is impleaded
B)
On the date on which the suit was initially instituted
C)
On the date on which the application for impleading a new plaintiff is made
D)
None of the above
Answer & Solution
Answer: Option
A
