In which of the following case, the Supreme Court held that the public authority providing services or goods as per the definition under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 must be held liable to pay adequate compensation to the consumer for harassment or mental agony or oppression caused to him for capricious exercise of power and the money could then be recovered from the erring public officials?
A. State of Gujarat v. Memom Mahomed
B. Shyam Sunder v. State of Rajasthan
C. Indian Medical Association v. V. P. Shantha
D. Lucknow Development Authority v. M. K. Gupta
Answer: Option D
This Question Belongs to Law >> Consumer Protection Act
Related Questions on Consumer Protection Act
The Consumer Protection Act 1986 extends to
A. The whole India
B. The whole India except J. & K.
C. The whole India except Nagaland tribal area
D. Both (B) and (C)
A. Personal Interest Litigations
B. Private Internal Litigations
C. Private Interest Litigations
D. Public Interest Litigation
E. Personal Information Litigations
A. 20 days
B. 30 days
C. 50 days
D. 70 days
E. 100 days
The maximum age limit of a person who can be a member in national commission is
A. 65
B. 70
C. 35
D. 60
Join The Discussion