Indian Evidence Act MCQ question and answer

91

A person is seen with same bank notes immediately after a theft in bank. The presumption is

A) He has stolen the money B) He has received the stolen money with required knowledge C) Either A or B D) None of the above

Discuss

Answer & Solution

Answer: Option C

No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board

92

Facts which are necessary to explain or introduce relevant facts of place, name, date, relationship and identity of parties are relevant

A) Under section 8 of Evidence Act B) Under section 9 of Evidence Act C) Under section 10 of Evidence Act D) Under section 11 of Evidence Act

Discuss

Answer & Solution

Answer: Option B

No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board

93

The court may in its discretion call for proving the facts

A) Of which judicial notice has to be taken B) Which have been admitted otherwise than such admissions C) Both A and B D) Neither A nor B

Discuss

Answer & Solution

Answer: Option B

No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board

94

A witness who is unable to speak may give his evidence in any other manner in which he can make it intelligible, as by writing or by signs; but such writing must be written and the signs made in open Court, the evidence so given shall be deemed to be oral evidence is known as

A) Dumb witness B) An informer C) Female witness D) Hostile witness

Discuss

Answer & Solution

Answer: Option A

No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board

95

Assertion (A): A gives B a receipt for money paid by B. Oral evidence is offered for the payment. The evidence is admissible.
Reason (R): A receipt is not a contract or grant in respect of which oral evidence is barred.

A) Both A and R are true and R is the correct explanation of A B) Both A and R are true but R is not the correct explanation of A C) A is true but R is false D) A is false but R is true

Discuss

Answer & Solution

Answer: Option A

No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board

96

Admission means

A) Statement made before Court B) Statement made in a document C) Statement suggesting inference as to any fact in issue D) None of the above

Discuss

Answer & Solution

Answer: Option C

No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board

97

The case, 'Queen Empress v. Abdullah' is related with

A) Burden of proof B) Privileged communication C) Confession D) Dying declaration

Discuss

Answer & Solution

Answer: Option D

No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board

98

A' tried for the murder of 'B' by beating with a club with the intention of causing his death.
At 'A's' trial which one of the following is not fact in issue?

A) 'A's' beating 'B' with the club B) A's' conversation with 'C' C) A's' causing 'B's' death with the club D) 'A's' intention to cause 'B's' death

Discuss

Answer & Solution

Answer: Option B

No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board

99

A sells B a horse and verbally warrants him sound. A gives B a paper in these words "Bought of A a horse for Rs. 500" Whether B can prove the verbal warranty:

A) Yes B) Barred under section 92 of Evidence Act C) No D) Under section 91 Indian Evidence Act only written documents can be proved

Discuss

Answer & Solution

Answer: Option A

No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board

100

A confession made by a person while in police custody is inadmissible under:

A) Section 29 of Evidence Act B) Section 26 of Evidence Act C) Section 25 of Evidence Act D) Section 27 of Evidence Act

Discuss

Answer & Solution

Answer: Option B

No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board

Indian Evidence Act MCQ question and answer | Law MCQ question