Indian Evidence Act MCQ question and answer

91

A Statement before the police officer in the course of investigation was that the design was carried out according to plan; but no reference was made to persons who were involved in murder or to the maker of statement himself:

A) Prosecution shall not be allowed to prove this statement, being hit by section 25 of Indian Evidence Act B) Prosecution may prove this statement. It is not hit by section 25 of Indian Evidence Act C) Only that part of the statement may be proved which leads to discovery of a fact in consequence of information received D) None of the above is correct

Discuss

Answer & Solution

Answer: Option A

No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board

92

Which of the following statements do not hold true for the section 108 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872?

A) The rule of Muhammadan Law that a missing person is to be regarded as alive till the expiry of 21 Rs. ninety years from the date of birth is superseded by this section B) The rule of Hindu Law that twelve years must elapse before an absent person, of whom nothing has been heard during the period is superseded by this section C) The burden of proof lies with the person claiming that the death has not happened D) None of these

Discuss

Answer & Solution

Answer: Option D

No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board

93

Match List-I with List-II and select the correct answer:

List I	List II
a. Presumption as to books, maps and charts	1. Section 85 of the Indian Evidence Act
b. Presumption as to power of Attorney	2. Section 87 of the Indian Evidence Act
c. Presumption as to telephonic messages	3. Section 88 of the Indian Evidence Act
d. Presumption as to plans made by authority of government	4. Section 83 of the Indian Evidence Act

A) a-2, b-3, c-1, d-4 B) a-4, b-1, c-3, d-2 C) a-2, b-1, c-3, d-4 D) a-4, b-3, c-1, d-2

Discuss

Answer & Solution

Answer: Option C

No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board

94

What is the nature of a statement given in NARCO Test?

A) It is not an evidence B) It is a scientific evidence C) It is an oral evidence D) It is a circumstantial evidence

Discuss

Answer & Solution

Answer: Option C

No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board

95

Following is not the exception to the rule of hearsay

A) Dying declaration B) Res gestae C) Medical Expert's Opinion D) Confession

Discuss

Answer & Solution

Answer: Option C

No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board

96

Which of the following is correct?

A) Rebuttable presumption arises that a man is alive if it is shown that he was alive within thirty years B) Rebuttable presumption arises that a man is dead if it is proved that he has not been heard of for seven years by those who would naturally have heard from him if he had been alive C) Both A and B D) None of these

Discuss

Answer & Solution

Answer: Option C

No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board

97

Confession may be recorded by

A) Executive Magistrate B) Judicial Magistrate having Jurisdiction only C) Judicial Magistrate with or without Jurisdiction D) Police officer having conferred with Power of Judicial Magistrate

Discuss

Answer & Solution

Answer: Option C

No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board

98

Section 41, Indian Evidence Act mainly deals with:

A) Property related cases of Indian Nationals and executed in India B) Homicide cases of Indian Nationals and executed in India C) Wills of Indian Nationals and executed in India D) None of them

Discuss

Answer & Solution

Answer: Option C

No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board

99

In a prosecution for rape, questions in Chief-Examination of the prosecutrix as to her general immoral character are:

A) Permissible B) Not permissible C) Permissible with the special permission of the court D) Permissible if the prosecutrix consents to it

Discuss

Answer & Solution

Answer: Option B

No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board

100

A party to a suit can prove a fact in issue,

A) By examining one witness only in proof thereof B) By examining not more than three witnesses in proof thereof C) By exarrurung any number of witnesses in proof thereof unless the Court is satisfied that examination of any particular witness is not relevant and is with the intent to delay the trial D) By examining any number ofwitnesses in proof thereof and the Court cannot limit the number of witnesses sought to be examined

Discuss

Answer & Solution

Answer: Option C

No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board

Indian Evidence Act MCQ question and answer | Law MCQ question