Indian Evidence Act MCQ question and answer

11

The doctrine of Estoppel is applied.

A) Only in civil matters B) Only in criminal matters C) Both in civil and criminal matters D) Only when there is violation of the principle of natural justice

Discuss

Answer & Solution

Answer: Option A

No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board

12

A party may put any question to a witness called by it

A) At its pleasure B) With the permission of the court C) With the consent of opposite party D) None of the above

Discuss

Answer & Solution

Answer: Option B

No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board

13

When the liability of a person who is one of the parties to the suit depends upon the liability of a stranger to the suit, then an admission by the stranger in respect of his liability shall be an admission on the part of that person who is a party to the suit. It has been so provided

A) Under section 21 of Evidence Act B) Under section 20 of Evidence Act C) Under section 19 of Evidence Act D) Under section 17 of Evidence Act

Discuss

Answer & Solution

Answer: Option C

No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board

14

In which case Section 27 of the Act was held to be constitutionally valid-

A) Deoman Upadhyay v. State of Uttar Pradesh B) Ahir Raja Khema v. State of Saurashtra C) Subramania Goundan v. State of Madras D) Nathu v. State of Uttar Pradesh

Discuss

Answer & Solution

Answer: Option A

No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board

15

Many rules of 'Law of Evidence' are contained in:

A) Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 B) Indian Limitation Act, 1963 C) Banker's Book Evidence Act, 1963 D) All of the above

Discuss

Answer & Solution

Answer: Option D

No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board

16

Which of the following pairs is not correctly matched?

A) Admission by persons having any proprietary interest ⇔ Section 18 of the Indian Evidence Act B) Confession made after removal of impression caused by inducement ⇔ Section 28 of the Indian Evidence Act C) Admission by persons expressly referred to by party to suit ⇔ Section 21 of the Indian Evidence Act D) Confession of an accused in police custody ⇔ Section 26 of the Indian Evidence Act

Discuss

Answer & Solution

Answer: Option C

No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board

17

One of the following statements is not true, which one is that:

A) A confession by one co-accused implicating other co-accused would be proved B) A confession to a police-officer cannot be proved C) A confession by a person in the custody of a police officer to any person in the presence of magistrate can be proved D) If the confession of a person leads to recovery of a thing it can be proved

Discuss

Answer & Solution

Answer: Option A

No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board

18

For proving execution of a registered will-

A) Be necessary to call at least two attesting witness B) Be necessary to call at least one attesting witness C) Not necessary to call any attesting witness D) Be necessary to call the registrar

Discuss

Answer & Solution

Answer: Option B

No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board

19

Plea of Alibi: Rule of Evidence is recognized in which one of the following sections of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872?

A) Section 9 B) Section 10 C) Section 11 D) Section 12

Discuss

Answer & Solution

Answer: Option C

No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board

20

Section 41, Indian Evidence Act deals with

A) Judgements in Personam B) Judgments in Rem C) Res Judicata D) Double Jeopardy

Discuss

Answer & Solution

Answer: Option B

No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board

Indian Evidence Act MCQ question and answer | Law MCQ question