Indian Evidence Act MCQ question and answer | Law MCQ question

Statement A: The presumption under Section 113-A of Indian Evidence Act is not attracted if the marriage took place more than seven years prior to the suicide of woman, even if the cruelty is established by prosecution.
Statement B: By the introduction of Section 113-A of Indian Evidence Act, the prosecution is not required to prove the facts beyond reasonable doubt against the accused.
Which of the statement is correct?

Match List-I with List-II and select the correct answer:

List I (Relevancy of facts)	List II (Section of Evidence Acts)
a. Facts as effect of facts in issue	1. Sec. 9
b. Facts forming part of same transaction	2. Sec. 8
c. Facts which constitute preparation for any fact in issue	3. Sec. 7
d. Facts necessary to explain or introduce relevant facts	4. Sec. 6

The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 applies to

The question before the Court . . . . . . . . of wreck of a ship, protest made by the captain . . . . . . . . attendance cannot be produced

What do you understand by the term "Leading Question"?

"A barrister is instructed by an attorney or a vakil that an important witness is a dacoit. This is a reasonable ground for asking the witness whether he is a dacoit."
This illustration is based on which of the following Sections of the Indian Evidence Act?

Admissions are not conclusive proof of the matters admitted but they may operate as:

Extrinsic evidence to show the meaning or supply the defects in an instrument, is prohibited under section 93, in respect of

In relation to the expression defined in Section 3 of the Indian Evidence Act, which of the following statements is not correct?

Confession made to a police officer