ExamVeda
Login
Home
51
Whether for constituting the offence under section 3(1)(x) SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989
Discuss
Answer & Solution
Answer: Option A
No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board
52
As per Section 2 (viia) of NDPS Act 'Commercial quantity' means
Discuss
Answer & Solution
Answer: Option D
No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board
53
A function can be characterized as quasi-judicial when:
Discuss
Answer & Solution
Answer: Option A
No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board
54
Give the correct answer - Where the licensing authority prior to grant of licence to any person under the Arms Act, calls for a report about the person from the concerned police station but the police station did not send the police report in the prescribed time. Then-
Discuss
Answer & Solution
Answer: Option C
No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board
55
For which one of the following purposes may the Chief Wild-life Warden not grant to any person a permit to enter and reside in a sanctuary?
Discuss
Answer & Solution
Answer: Option C
No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board
56
The imprisonment for owning or keeping of a gaming House under the Public Gaming Act, 1867 for a term not exceeding
Discuss
Answer & Solution
Answer: Option C
No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board
57
In which of the following cases, the Supreme Court held that the principles of natural justice are applicable to administrative proceedings also?
Discuss
Answer & Solution
Answer: Option C
No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board
58
Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 the expression "Company" means
Discuss
Answer & Solution
Answer: Option A
No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board
59
Under the Land Acquisition Act, the arable land means
Discuss
Answer & Solution
Answer: Option C
No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board
60
In which case the Supreme Court held that where the parties set-up competing titles and the differences are resolved by a compromise, there is no question of one deriving title from the other and so the document is not compulsorily registrable?
Discuss
Answer & Solution
Answer: Option A
No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board