Indian Evidence Act MCQ question and answer

71

When can a person prove his own statement constituting admission or it may be proved on his behalf?

A) When it is relevant as dying declaration B) When it is relevant as admission C) When it is relevant as confession D) When it is only an oral admission as to content electronic record

Discuss

Answer & Solution

Answer: Option A

No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board

72

Which of the following is not an example of public document?

A) Letters between authorities B) Electoral list C) Insurance Policy D) Order sheet in a case

Discuss

Answer & Solution

Answer: Option C

No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board

73

What is re-examination of a witness?

A) Recalling the witness B) Repeated examination of the witness C) Cross examination of one's own witness D) None of the above

Discuss

Answer & Solution

Answer: Option C

No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board

74

Confession recorded by a Magistrate on oath is

A) Admissible B) Inadmissible C) Admissible only to the extent of corroboration to the other evidence on record D) Admissible if corroborated by other evidence on record

Discuss

Answer & Solution

Answer: Option B

No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board

75

A statement to become relevant under Section 32(1) of the Indian Evidence Act as dying declaration should have been made under which of the following circumstances?

A) It should have been made in relation to the succession to his property after his death B) It should have been made under imminent expectation of death C) It should be in relation to the cause of his death or circumstances of the transaction that resulted in his death D) It should have been made in the will executed by him

Discuss

Answer & Solution

Answer: Option C

No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board

76

Oral admission as to contents of electronic records are provided under the Indian Evidence Act in

A) Section 20 B) Section 23 C) Section 22A D) Section 22B

Discuss

Answer & Solution

Answer: Option C

No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board

77

In which of the following cases constitutionality of Section 73 of the Evidence Act was challenged for violation of Article 20(3) of the Constitution?

A) State of Bombay v. Kathikalu B) Rattan Singh v. Himachal Pradesh C) Kashmira Singh v. State of Madhya Pradesh D) None of the above

Discuss

Answer & Solution

Answer: Option A

No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board

78

In the law of evidence, a 'retracted confession'

A) Is of no value B) Is alone sufficientfor conviction C) Can be acted upon, but as a matter of prudence the court must look for some corroboration from other facts and evidences D) None of the above

Discuss

Answer & Solution

Answer: Option C

No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board

79

Under section 14 of Evidence Act - Explanation I

A) Evidence of general disposition, habit or tendencies is inadmissible B) Evidence having a distinct and immediate reference to the particular matter in question is admissible C) Both A and B are correct D) Both A and B are incorrect

Discuss

Answer & Solution

Answer: Option C

No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board

80

Indian Evidence Act: 'A' and 'B' were jointly tried for the murder of 'C'. During the trial 'A' said . . . . . . . . "B" and I murdered 'C'. What is the nature of this evidence against 'B'?

A) Substantive evidence B) Corroborative evidence C) Hearsay evidence D) Direct evidence

Discuss

Answer & Solution

Answer: Option B

No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board

Indian Evidence Act MCQ question and answer | Law MCQ question