Indian Penal Code MCQ question and answer

31

In which case the court made a clear distinction between 'common intention' and 'similar intention'?

A) Barendra Kumar Ghosh v. King Emperor B) Mahboob Shah v. King Emperor C) Kripal Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh D) Rishi Deo Pandey v. State of Uttar Pradesh

Discuss

Answer & Solution

Answer: Option B

No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board

32

If a person spits on the face of another person, he shall be guilty of:

A) Assault B) Battery C) Use of force D) Both A and B

Discuss

Answer & Solution

Answer: Option C

No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board

33

The offence of 'Dacoity' is defined in the Indian Penal Code, 1860 in

A) Section 391 B) Section 392 C) Section 393 D) Section 394

Discuss

Answer & Solution

Answer: Option A

No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board

34

"A" agree with "B" that he will help "B" in copying in his examination; this is an act of

A) Criminal conspiracy B) Abetment C) Common intention D) Common object

Discuss

Answer & Solution

Answer: Option A

No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board

35

A' intending to murder 'B' by poisoning, purchases poison and mixes the same with a glass of water. He gives the glass to the bearer to serve 'B'. The bearer while approaching , 'B' loses balance and the glass drops out of his plate. Which one of the following statements is correct in this context?

A) 'A' has committed no offence B) A' has committed the offence of attempt to commit culpable homicide C) A' has committed the offence of abetment D) A' has committed the offence of attempt to murder

Discuss

Answer & Solution

Answer: Option D

No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board

36

"Common Intention" and "similar intention" was distinguished in the famous case of

A) Barendra K. Ghosh v. King, 1925 PC 1 B) Mehboob Shah v. Emperor, 1943 PC 118 C) Kripal Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh, 1954 SC 706 D) Rishidev Pandey v. State of Uttar Pradesh, 1955 SC 331

Discuss

Answer & Solution

Answer: Option B

No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board

37

Possession of Indian coin by a person who knew it to be counterfeit when he became possessed thereof is dealt under-

A) Section 242 of Indian Penal Code B) Section 243 of Indian Penal Code C) Section 244 of Indian Penal Code D) Section 245 of Indian Penal Code

Discuss

Answer & Solution

Answer: Option B

No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board

38

Fraudulently' has been defined as doing anything with intent to defraud

A) Section 23 B) Section 25 C) Section 24 D) Section 26

Discuss

Answer & Solution

Answer: Option B

No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board

39

Which one of the following is not an illustration of grievous hurt?

A) Emasculation B) Dislocation of bone C) Permanent disfiguration of face D) Hurt which causes the sufferer in severe bodily pain for the period of 15 days

Discuss

Answer & Solution

Answer: Option D

No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board

40

X ordered his employee Y to beat Z. Y refuses. Now

A) X has committed abetment & Y has committed assault B) X has committed abetment & Y has committed no offence C) X & Y both have committed no offence D) X has committed no offence but Y has committed offence of subordination

Discuss

Answer & Solution

Answer: Option B

No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board

Indian Penal Code MCQ question and answer | Law MCQ question