Indian Penal Code MCQ question and answer | Law MCQ question

A' and 'B' have been accused of an offence where the accused persons had no intention of causing the death of any one and no injury was found on the deceased which was sufficient to cause death in the ordinary course of nature. As per medical opinion, the injuries were not likely to cause death. It could not be established as to which of the two accused inflicted injuries on the head of the deceased. The accused should be liable to be convicted under:

Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code regarding a criminal act done by several persons in furtherance of the common intention of all is

A child offender below the age of seven years cannot even be subjected to juvenile justice proceedings, because

The Section of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 dealing with trafficking of person is

Abetment of any offence when one act is abetted and a different act is done; subject to proviso is dealt under-

In case of an offence punishable with fine only, an offender who is sentenced to pay a fine exceeding Rs. 100, the imprisonment in default of payment of fine shall not exceed

A' in good faith accuses 'Z' before a Magistrate:

Under Exception 4 of Section 300 of Indian Penal Code:

When all the incriminating facts and circumstances are found to be incompatible with the innocence of the accused then:

Indian Penal Code: X intended to kill A but instead killed B whom he had no intention to kill under which doctrine is X liable for the murder of B.