ExamVeda
Login
Home
21
Save as provided by the Provincial Small Cause Courts Act a decree or order made under the provisions of the said Act shall be
Discuss
Answer & Solution
Answer: Option A
No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board
22
A deposits a box of gold coins with B as his agent. He then writes to C for the purpose of making the gold coins a security for a debt due from himself to C. A afterwards alleges that C's debt is satisfied and C alleges the contrary. Both claim the gold coins from B. B may institute an interpleader suit against
Discuss
Answer & Solution
Answer: Option D
No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board
23
Order II, Rule 2 of Code of Civil Procedure does not apply to
Discuss
Answer & Solution
Answer: Option C
No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board
24
Where the suit is dismissed under rule 2 or 3 of order 9 Code of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff?
Discuss
Answer & Solution
Answer: Option A
No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board
25
Court in which suits to be instituted comes under which of the following in the Code of Civil Procedure?
Discuss
Answer & Solution
Answer: Option C
No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board
26
A suit relating to immovable property shall be instituted at a place:
Discuss
Answer & Solution
Answer: Option B
No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board
27
Which of the following deals with the procedure in case of non-attendance of one or more of served defendants in the Code of Civil Procedure?
Discuss
Answer & Solution
Answer: Option A
No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board
28
Execution of a decree can be applied for
Discuss
Answer & Solution
Answer: Option D
No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board
29
An ex-parte decree passed under Order XXXVII of Code of Civil Procedure can be set aside under Order XXXVII, Rule 4
Discuss
Answer & Solution
Answer: Option A
No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board
30
In a contractual dispute between two parties A and B, A files a suit in New Delhi where the cause of action arose. Two days later, B files a suit in the same matter in Mumbai, where A is resident. The pendency of the first suit is not brought to the notice of the court in Mumbai. The court pronounces judgement in second suit before the first suit is decided. Would such decision operate as a bar on the court in New Delhi to try the suit any further?
Discuss
Answer & Solution
Answer: Option A
No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board