ExamVeda
Login
Home
21
Which of the following is correct
Discuss
Answer & Solution
Answer: Option D
No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board
22
X, a mother, along with her daughter, Y was shopping in a departmental store, named. "All the Necessities". Y slipped 5 lipsticks in the bag of her mother. They were apprehended by the security staff of the store and after one hour both were handed over to the police. Y was convicted for theft but X was acquitted. X sued for false imprisonment by the store.
Discuss
Answer & Solution
Answer: Option B
No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board
23
The 'last opportunity' principle is related to the:
Discuss
Answer & Solution
Answer: Option D
No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board
24
Which of the following is/are exception(s) to the rule of strict liability recognized by Rylands v. Fletcher?
(1) Defendant's default
(2) Act of God
(3) Consent of the third party
(4) Statutory authority
Choose the correct answer from the given below:
Discuss
Answer & Solution
Answer: Option D
No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board
25
Defamation is defined under
Discuss
Answer & Solution
Answer: Option B
No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board
26
Hazardous activities that attract absolute liability are those activities, which are
Discuss
Answer & Solution
Answer: Option D
No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board
27
A theft had been committed in the defendant's house. He informed the police that he suspected the plaintiff for the same. Therefore the plaintiff was arrested by the police. A complaint was filed by the defendant but the plaintiff was subsequently discharged by the magistrate as the final report showed that there was no evidence connecting the plaintiff with the theft. The plaintiff filed a suit for damages on the ground of malicious prosecution.
In the above case, which one of the following decisions is correct?
Discuss
Answer & Solution
Answer: Option D
No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board
28
Match List I with List II Choose the correct answer from the options given below:
List I List II
a. Wagon Mound Case 1. Test of Reasonable Foreseeability
b. Folemis Case 2. Test of Directness
c. Smith v. Leech Brain & Co. 3. Egg-Shell Skull Rule
d. Smith v. Charles Baker & Sons 4. Volenti non fit Injuria
Discuss
Answer & Solution
Answer: Option A
No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board
29
The House of Lords ruling in Bolam case (1956) has laid down law relating to:
Discuss
Answer & Solution
Answer: Option B
No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board
30
Which among the following statutes relates to tort
Discuss
Answer & Solution
Answer: Option D
No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board